Random notes 2: bitcoin as pure money; inequality between countries is decreasing; “a corporation is like a rogue AI”

I’ll try to share a post like this every week, it’s an opportunity for me to organize and review my notes from what I’ve watched/read/listened to over the past week. Here is the first installment from last week.

My favorite information mediums right now are podcasts and online articles (queued in Pocket), followed by ebooks (Kindle) and YouTube.

First, some art:

Sunshine by Hiroshi Nagai

The piece is called Sunshine, by Hiroshi Nagai.

Ark’s new paper on “Bitcoin as novel economic institution” [download here]

  • During the last 10 to 15 years, countries have been increasing capital controls rather than decreasing them. Since 2007, the share of countries increasing capital controls has soared 300% to 15%, while the share of countries reducing them has dropped 60% to 5%,
  • In the last century, three monetary policy changes cascaded, cutting the purchasing power of almost half of the world’s currencies by 50%: the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 and Europe’s decision to abandon the gold standard in 1918, the US shift from the gold standard to the gold-exchange standard in 1933, and US abandonment of the gold exchange standard in 1971.,
  • Moreover, in the US today the minimum reserve requirement for deposit institutions is zero. Indeed, since 1995 the average bank reserve requirement globally has dropped by nearly 80%,
  • Lowercase ‘b’ bitcoin, the asset, is a standardized unit of value embedded in the network. Its value acts as the signaling mechanism that aligns network stakeholders. In some ways, we believe it is the purest form of money ever created:
  • Since its creation, Bitcoin has settled more than $2.5 trillion in transactions, as shown in Figure 8, the average size of which has been $2,000.

…eagerly awaiting Ark’s part 2.

If you want a better understanding of the global economy and how it relates to your own investment decisions, you can’t do better than Lyn Alden. I’ve been binging her newsletter and writings and podcast appearances. Here are some excerpts:

  • here is how the Bank of England defines QE on their website, in case we want to hear what the Brits would call it: “Money is either physical, like banknotes, or digital, like the money in your bank account. Quantitative easing involves us creating digital money. We then use it to buy things like government debt in the form of bonds. You may also hear it called ‘QE’ or ‘asset purchase’ – these are the same thing.”
  • Currently, the U.S. has about $1.8 trillion in currency in circulation and $16 trillion in broad money supply (which also includes checking accounts, savings accounts, CDs, all sorts of digital cash and cash-like assets).
  • Russia, for example, is buying massive amounts of gold year after year, including buying straight through their 2015/2016 recession. They’ve increased their gold reserves by 5x over the past decade, from 400 tons to 2,000 tons
  • Historically, the bond market has been the “smart money” because it is largely driven by institutional investors rather than retail investors. It tends to be more focused on near-term math than on emotion or long-term projections, and as such tends to front-run the equity market, at least in terms of major transitions.
  • There was a nearly four-decade period from the mid-1930’s to the mid-1970’s where buying and holding Treasuries was a fool’s errand, because they mostly lost purchasing power by failing to keep up with inflation. This was during a period of major long-term debt deleveraging and currency devaluation.

The Foreign Affairs has a very striking article on how global inequality is falling between countries:

  • People in the middle of the global income distribution, whose incomes grew substantially, overwhelmingly lived in Asia, many of them in China. People farther to the right, who were richer than the Asians but experienced much lower income growth rates, mainly lived in the advanced economies of Japan, the United States, and the countries of western Europe. Finally, people at the far right end of the graph, the richest one percent, enjoyed high income growth rates much like those in the middle of the global income distribution.
  • As measured by the Gini coefficient, which ranges from zero (a hypothetical situation in which every person has the same income) to one (a hypothetical situation in which one person receives all income), global inequality fell from 0.70 in 1988 to 0.67 in 2008 and then further to 0.62 in 2013
  • High growth in China, in global terms, is ceasing to be an equalizing force. Soon, it will contribute to rising global inequality. But India, with a population that may soon surpass China’s and is still relatively poor, now plays an important role in making the world more equal. In the last 20 years, China and India have driven the reduction in global inequality. From now on, only Indian growth will perform that same function
  • If China’s growth continues to exceed Western countries’ growth by two to three percentage points annually, within the next decade many middle-class Chinese will become wealthier than their middle-class counterparts in the West. For the first time in two centuries, Westerners with middling incomes within their own nations will no longer be part of the global elite—that is, in the top quintile (20 percent) of global incomes. This will be a truly remarkable development. From the 1820s onward—when national economic data of this kind were first collected—the West has consistently been wealthier than any other part of the world

Thought provoking tweet from Brian Roemmele (his account drops similar thought-provokers on a daily basis):

Apparently, negative emotions can be useful if we believe they’re useful:
The team found that the link between negative mental states and poor emotional and physical health was weaker in individuals who considered negative moods as useful. Indeed, negative moods correlated with low life satisfaction only in people who did not perceive adverse feelings as helpful or pleasant.

Some of my own notes from TechCrunch’s Alex Wilhelm on the Indie Hackers podcast:

  • Their best performing pieces are explainer-y pieces eg how to structure a cap table; insane shelf life but also a lot of planning and work
  • Really important to write about current events because that’s what gets attention and gets shared.
  • If you have a broader point, connect it to a news story that’s happening right now
  • It’s about the “newshook” – the key news event that happened (eg, Tesla shares soared 20% after stock split; father of three killed in 4-way crash)

Are we presently in a fourth turning?
Howe and Strauss observe that American history shows a new era, or “turning” about every 20 years. In simplest terms, the “First Turning” is an upbeat era of strengthening institutions. The “Second Turning” is an awakening, a passionate era of spiritual upheaval, when the old order comes under attack. The “Third Turning” is an unraveling — a time when individualism is strengthened and institutions are weakened. The “Fourth Turning” is a crisis, a decisive era of secular upheaval — the old order is toppled and a new one put in its place.

For me, the concept has echoes of Sovereign Individual.

On the rise and rise of US disability benefits recipients:

  • The federal government spends more money each year on cash payments for disabled former workers than it spends on food stamps and welfare combined
  • “That’s a kind of ugly secret of the American labor market,” David Autor, an economist at MIT, told me. “Part of the reason our unemployment rates have been low, until recently, is that a lot of people who would have trouble finding jobs are on a different program.”

Real estate investor with large YouTube following believes a housing crash is coming in 2021. Here are my notes on his reasons why:
1. There was a temporary supply decline during the pandemic, but a lot of supply is coming back now
2. Interest rates can’t get lower
3. There are millions with no or reduced jobs
Lastly, he believes property taxes will increase in most metros

Luke Gromen on Erik Townsend’s Macro Voices podcast

  • Biggest surplus nations: EU then China then Japan
  • Biggest deficit nations: US then UK
  • Eurodollar market is 60-100T, and Luke believes Fed willing to bail out whole thing if necessary to prevent system collapse
  • Global banks have stopped buying US Treasuries for first time in 70 years…this already started in 2014
  • US true interest payments already more than 100% of tax receipts
  • Luke quoting Marc Faber: when things get really bad, the price of everything goes up
  • Dutch National Bank: If whole thing collapses, we own gold because gold will be used to rebuild the whole thing
  • It’ll be gold at 22K – 10x from here, not 10-20% moves
  • If that happens there will be a debt jubilee. Bond holders and creditors would get burned

Enjoyed this NYT profile of mathematician Eugenia Cheung

  • Deep nonfiction takes longer to absorb, and math books take years. I love the act of turning pages when I’m reading a novel; when I’m studying a math book I might need to spend several weeks on one paragraph.
  • It’s easier to “bridge” science and art when you don’t really think there’s a gap between them in the first place, as I don’t. The boundaries between subjects are really artificial constructs by humans, like the boundaries between colors in a rainbow.

Improve your posture, improve your teeth? from the NYT
If you’re wondering why a dentist cares about ergonomics, the simple truth is that nerves in your neck and shoulder muscles lead into the temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, which connects the jawbone to the skull. Poor posture during the day can translate into a grinding problem at night

From The Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, which I am enjoying in spite of its depressing revelations:
Creating an easy-to-learn language had been President Sukarno’s highest priority after Indonesia won its independence from the Netherlands. More than 350 languages and dialects are spoken throughout the archipelago, and Sukarno realized that his country needed a common vocabulary in order to unite people from the many islands and cultures. He recruited an international team of linguists, and Bahasa Indonesia was the highly successful result. Based on Malay, it avoids many of the tense changes, irregular verbs, and other complications that characterize most languages.

Darius Kazemi’s AI and Art talk on YouTube had me scratching my head in a good way.

  • “A pun is a context switch”
  • “Corporation is like a rogue AI”
  • “Capital is teleological, it has goals, and it’s goal is to increase capital”
  • Humans are really good at enslaving others, which is why we also fear AI will enslave us (in other words, we are projecting)

After watching, I immediately queued several of his YT talks.

Reed Hastings interviewed on The Economist podcast:

  • Netflix key metric is the ratio of total-time-watched-to-cost
  • Has $15B in debts
  • Added 30M subscribers in 1H2020
  • Question he likes to ask: Is the internet going to grow or shrink in next 20 years?
  • Admire and fear Disney, it’s streaming service grew to 60M subscribers in first year, it took Netflix 12 years

That’s it folks. All typos and misrepresentations are 100% mine! Here’s the first random notes post if you like informational potpourri. Til the next one!

The secrets of Reed Hastings and Netflix culture

Recent share price swings aside, Netflix is among the most innovative companies of the last 2 decades.

They’re also incredibly transparent, to our benefit.

I first read this presentation 4 years ago. I remember thinking, “holy shit”, and immediately forwarding to the shopkick team.

I’ve re-read it 3 or 4 times. Still not enough.

It’s now part of 1-Read-A-Day.

Here are my takeaways

I bias towards the unusual (since we all know the old yarns of “A players attract other A players”, “employees are your #1 asset”, blah yada etc)

1. A company’s REAL values are shown by who’s rewarded, who’s promoted, and who’s fired (slide 6)

2. “Adequate performance gets a generous severance package” (slide 22, reminds me a little of Zappos’ $1K to quit) [http://blogs.hbr.org/taylor/2008/05/why_zappos_pays_new_employees.html]

3. The Keeper Test: “Which of my people, if they told me they were leaving, for a similar job at a peer company, would I fight hard to keep at Netflix?” (slide 25)

4. “Brilliant jerks” are avoided – hurts effective teamwork (slide 35)

5. Growth –> More complexity –> More processes –> Less talent –> Long-term irrelevance (slide 52)

6. Netflix’s solution to above? Increase talent density to offset rising complexity. Do this by hiring only “high performance people” and giving them more freedom (slide 54)

7. Example: no vacation policy; take what you want (now a startup-world standard) (slide 69)

8. Departments are “highly aligned” (agree on goals), and “loosely coupled” (freedom in implementation) (slide 93)

9. Pay top of market, because Netflix only wants top people – top of market is re-defined with each hire, each performance review (slide 96)

10. Comp is salary-focused. Employees can choose to trade salary for stock options (109)

11. Everyone gets $10K in benefits, from receptionist to CEO (slide 109) – this was published in 2009

12. All options are fully vested – employees stay for the right reasons

13. For promotion, new job must be “big enough”, and you must be a superstar in your current role

That’s it, folks!